Windows IT Pro is the authoritative and independent resource for windows nt, windows 2000, windows 2003, windows xp. Features a collection of resources and magazines for windows IT professionals.
  
  
  Advanced Search 


November 19, 2008

Q. How do Cluster Shared Volumes work in Windows Server 2008 R2?


RSS
Subscribe to Windows IT Pro | See More Clustering and Load Balancing Articles Here | Reprints | Or get the Monthly Online Pass—only $5.95 a month!

NTFS is not a clustered file system because it's designed to be accessed only by a single server and does not support concurrent access by multiple servers simultaneously. This is not usually a problem. In a failover cluster, only one node is active for a service/application, and the LUN containing pertinent data is owned by the active node. If the service/application has to move to another node, the physical disk resource is dismounted then remounted to the new active node, which means a few seconds of downtime while the LUN is failed over between nodes. This few seconds needed to move the LUN is not acceptable with virtualization; you want zero seconds of downtime when moving a virtual machine (VM) between nodes, which means you need a way for multiple nodes to concurrently access the VHD files on a LUN. This is shown in this figure. Server 2008 R2 now has Cluster Shared Volumes (CSVs), which are shared disks in Available Storage visible by all cluster nodes (such as LUNs on a SAN) that have been allocated to Cluster Shared Volumes. Cluster Shared Volumes appear as subfolders of a common %systemroot%:\ClusterStorage folder. Each volume is named Volume (e.g., C:\ClusterStorage\Volume1 and C:\ClusterStorage\Volume2). A VM is placed in its own subfolder of a VolumeN folder. The great feature of CSV is that all nodes in the cluster can access the content of a CSV concurrently, which means there is no delay if a different node needs to start accessing a VHD. This means each VM is placed in its own sub-folder of a volume, so you no longer need one LUN per VM to get granular failover capabilities. The figure below shows the ClusterStorage folder of a cluster with two volumes that are part of CSV. For each CSV, one node in the cluster acts as the coordinator node for that volume. It's the only node that can write NTFS metadata to the volume. This means all nodes trying to write metadata to a CSV send the metadata updates to the coordinator node for the volume. All nodes in the cluster can write normal block level information to the volume directly which is the majority of write activity. CSV is actually implemented via the CSVFilter.sys file system mini-filter driver which is responsible for the interception of the NTFS metadata requests and all I/O requests in the event a node loses communication with the target volume. A node can ask the coordinator to perform all its I/O if it can no longer communicate with the target volume. CSV is currently only supported for Hyper-V purposes. As an additional bonus, CSV removes the previous problem where each VHD had to be on its own LUN to allow the LUN to be moved independently between nodes in the cluster. This was a requirement in order for VMs to be moved independently of each other, since the LUN access was the smallest unit of failover. With the CSVs, you can use a single LUN with multiple VHDs all being accessed by different nodes in the cluster at the same time, removing the need for 1 LUN per VM. This saves on complexity and saves on wasted space by pooling free space with potentially hundreds of small LUNs.

End of Article



Reader Comments

You must log on before posting a comment.

If you don't have a username & password, please register now.




Top Viewed ArticlesView all articles
CES 2009: Ballmer Announces Windows 7, Windows Live, Live Search Milestones

During his first-ever Consumer Electronics Show (CES) 2009 keynote address last night in Las Vegas, Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer announced the pending public availability of a feature-complete Windows 7, the final version of Windows Live Essentials, and ...

10 Reasons to Deploy Windows Vista

The decision to upgrade your XP systems to Vista is simple when you consider features such as easier backup, a great desktop search, and vastly improved security options. ...

10 Reasons Not to Deploy Windows Vista

The decision to upgrade to Vista has to make business sense, but many companies find the costs in training and application compatibility problems outweigh any benefits Vista brings. ...


Windows OSs Whitepapers Why SaaS is the Right Solution for Log Management

Related Events Virtualization Forum: Optimizing Storage, Networks, Desktops, and Security

Cloud Computing Forum: Integrating Software, Server and Storage as a Service into Your Enterprise IT Delivery Model

Virtualization Forum: Optimizing Storage, Networks, Desktops, and Security

Check out our list of Free Email Newsletters!

Windows OSs eBooks Understanding and Leveraging Code Signing Technologies

A Guide to Windows Certification and Public Keys

SQL Server Administration for Oracle DBAs

Related Windows OSs Resources Become a VIP member of the Windows IT Pro community!
Get it all with the VIP CD and VIP access. A $500+ value for only $279!

Subscribe to Windows IT Pro!
Solve your toughest technical problems with our experts and access 10,000 + articles online. 30% off

Monthly Online Pass - Only $5.95!
Get instant access to 10,000+ articles from Windows IT Pro Magazine!

TechNet Virtual Labs
Evaluate and test Microsoft's newest products.


Windows IT Pro Home Register FAQ for Windows WinInfo News
Europe Edition About Us Contact Us/Customer Service Media Kit Affiliates / Licensing  
SQL Server Magazine Office & SharePoint Pro Windows Dev Pro IT Job Hound ITTV
IT Library Technology Resource Directory Connected Home Windows Excavator Windows SuperSite 
 
 Windows IT Pro is a Division of Penton Media Inc.
 Copyright © 2009 Penton Media, Inc., All rights reserved. Terms and Use | Privacy Statement | Reprints and Licensing